A new report speculates the plot and scenes of the premiere episode of “Outlander” Season 3. The scenes include the aftermath of the Battle of Culloden and flashbacks of Claire and Frank.
The next season of the popular Starz TV show is based on Diana Gabaldon’s third book in the series titled “Voyager.” A report on Outlander Online speculates some of the scenes and events in the premiere episode, based on the book. The report believes that the episode will begin with battlefield of Culloden, where Black Jack Randall (Tobias Menzies) lies dead.
Jamie (Sam Heughan) is severally wounded and is barely alive. Later, a British Major, Lord Melton, arrives and announces that all the “traitors” are to be executed. One by one the Highlanders give their name and are taken out to be shot.
When it is Jamie’s turn, Lord Melton realises that this is Red Jamie who has a prince on his head. The young Scotsman is also the man who spared the life of Melton’s brother William Grey (Oscar Kennedy).
Although Jamie is supposed to die, he survives in the premiere episode of “Outlander” Season 3. Lord Melton sends the wounded warrior to Lallybroch, thinking that he will not be able to survive the journey. The British Major is, however, mistaken in his assessment.
In a flashback to 1940s Boston, there is tension between Frank (Tobias Menzies) and Claire (Caitriona Balfe). The two fight, but later reconcile. The report suggests that there could be a love making scene for the two characters; their first since Claire’s return.
The premiere episode of “Outlander” Season 3 could also have a scene of Brianna (Sophie Skelton) and Roger Wakefield (Richard Rankin) working together again. This time they may be seen researching about the legend of Leap O’ The Cask and the Dunbonnet, which Brianna believes is about Jamie.
Sam Heughan is most excited to see John Grey again in “Outlander” Season 3, the actor revealed while interacting with a fan recently. The young character, who was introduced in the second season, is expected to return as an older Lord John Grey next year and cross paths with the Frasers.
John Grey (Oscar Kennedy) is the 16 year old British soldier who went by the name William in the second season of the TV series. He was the boy that the Frasers tricked into revealing sensitive information about his army, with Claire (Caitriona Balfe) pretending to be a prisoner of the Highlanders.
In the next season, John Grey will appear as the Governor of Ardsmuir Prison, according to the books written by Diana Gabaldon. He will meet with Jamie Fraser (Sam Heughan) there, and the two will form an unexpected and shaky friendship. The character gains significance as the story progresses and is expected to be a recurring character starting with “Outlander” Season 3.
Co-executive Producer Maril Davis pointed out that the Scottish warrior is younger than Claire. The writers and producers were discussing how they wanted to approach the look of the character, but Davis teased that the viewers should expect something similar to what they did with Claire, in terms of her looking older. The producer said that most part of this aspect will be shown through acting.
“Outlander” Season 3 will be an adaptation of the novel “Voyager.” Davis teased that it will begin with Claire debating about whether she should go back in time and reunite with Jamie, and leave her daughter behind. The main characters will travel to Jamaica in the next season, and a lot of the story will take place on ships.
Starz president Chris Albrecht isn’t beating around the bush when it comes to the lack of Emmy love for critical and audience darlings like Outlander and Black Sails. Simply put, Albrecht says Starz simply doesn’t have enough money to launch a proper Emmy campaign.
“I don’t think we’ll ever break through with those people on those shows. I was part of the team that invented how to campaign for Emmy Awards,” Albrecht said during the Starz panel at the Television Critics Association fall previews on Monday. “Trust me, it’s not a level playing field. I spent years inside the TV Academy, working it. It took a lot of money, and there’s a certain amount of momentum that goes along with that.”
That’s not to say that Albrecht doesn’t believe his shows are worthy of awards. The production and writing on Starz’s original programming could stand up to any of the other premium and network cable shows. It’s the process that doesn’t allow for newcomers to have a fair share at the top prizes, especially in the current era of “Peak TV.”
“It’s a very distinct group of people, no matter how they try and expand their membership base,” Albrecht said of the Television Academy. “They should be finding a way to … have something that reflects this expansion, instead of [their process, which] by sheer numbers … ends up with a longer list of losers and the same number of winners.”
Albrecht says he’s confident that Starz will eventually stumble on a show that gets recognition the Academy, but it still won’t explain why they’ve been left out in the cold thus far.
“I know that people who work on these shows would like to see their names alongside their peers. There will be a show that comes along. We won’t know what one it is,” he said. “There won’t be a better reason [to nominate it over] Outlander or Survivor’s Remorse, it’ll just be a reason.”
Albrecht also said that his focus isn’t on awards at all, especially after Starz’s disappointing night at this year’s Golden Globes. (Outlander’s Caitriona Balfe and Tobias Menzies received acting nods, but neither pulled out the win.)
“Why do we go to the Globes? I love those people. They rarely let anyone go home empty-handed, but we went home empty-handed this year,” he said. “I was really surprised. I was like, ‘Wow, okay. What does this mean?’ This is all silly.”
Do you think shows like Outlander and Black Sails deserve Emmy recognition?
“Outlander” fans are in for more changes. Star Sam Heughan said the drama will feel like a new show when it returns to Starz next year.
“It’s going to be a completely different show,” Heughan told Vulture. “Next year’s stuff is probably the most interesting, in a way. We’ve been setting it up, setting the stage, introducing these characters, and now it goes into new, different worlds.”
That isn’t too surprising to hear. After all, the Season 2 finale skipped ahead 20 years. Claire (Caitriona Balfe) was in Scotland in 1968 with her daughter Brianna (Sophie Skelton), but once she realized that Jamie (Heughan) didn’t die at the Battle of Culloden, she determined she had to go back.
However, Season 3 (which is based on Diana Gabaldon’s “Voyager”) will leave Europe as the characters head to Jamaica. Though Heughan would love to leave the Scotland-based production to film on location, producer Maril Davis said that no decisions have been made about that yet. “They go to Jamaica, there’s stuff that happens on ships, and the production challenges of that will also test our abilities,” she told Entertainment Tonight. “But I would say so far I’m really excited about what we’re doing and coming up with.”
Regardless of where they shoot, Heughan is excited for all the changes. He previously teased that Jamie will be different in “Outlander” Season 3. “We won’t actually see what happens to Jamie after she’s gone through the stones until the next season – for me that’s a really big question and something that will be really interesting to look at: who is Jamie without Claire, why is he still surviving or what has he got to live for when he’s lost the woman that he loves?” he told Variety. “She will eventually return, but they’re both older, so who is the man he’s become age-wise, physically? I think that’s the joy of the show, it’s never the same thing, it’s constantly moving, so next season should be quite an adventure.”
It seems many fans online are less worried about Jamie’s personal growth and more concerned about his physical appearance. The show aged Caitriona Balfe to make Claire look older, but they’re still waiting to see what Jamie looks like. Though Heughan joked about getting fat for the new season, he reminded fans that the look isn’t that important. “It’s less about his appearance, and more about who he is without Claire,” he warned.
“Outlander” Season 3 will return to Starz next year.
Even if you’re not familiar with Outlander and all its gripping twists, turns and time-traveling, there’s one thing you’re probably pretty sure of: Sam Heughan is very, very easy on the eyes.
So what can we expect now that he’s prepping to play an older Jamie Fraser in the upcoming season 3?
“I’m thinking about getting really fat,” the actor joked to Vulture at a screening of Star Trek Beyond on Monday. “I’m thinking eating a lot and not working out would be really good.”
Of course, he was just kidding: “Do we really want to see that?” he quickly added, shaking his head.
Season 2 of the hit Starz series wrapped with a flash-forward of his on-screen love interest Claire (Caitriona Balfe), but viewers still haven’t seen how aging affects her 18th-century husband. Although Heughan can’t say much, the 36-year-old does explain “it’s less about his appearance, and more about who he is without Claire.”
“It’s going to be a completely different show,” he added. “Next year’s stuff is probably the most interesting, in a way. We’ve been setting it up, setting the stage, introducing these characters, and now it goes into new, different worlds.”
One particularly new setting for the hit show? The Caribbean! And while it hasn’t been determined where the production will actually shoot those scenes, Heughan thinks going to “Jamaica would be nice.”
“Piña coladas!” he added. Count us in!
A premiere date for Outlander season 3 has not yet been announced.
Thanks to the flash-forward in the Outlander season finale, we got to see what an older Claire looks and acts like — but we won’t be privy to how aging affects her 18th-century husband Jamie until we return in season three. When Vulture caught up with actor Sam Heughan at a screening of Star Trek Beyond on Monday night, we inquired about how he’s prepping to play an older Jamie. “I’m thinking about getting really fat,” he joked. “I’m thinking eating a lot and not working out would be really good.” But Heughan knows that’s not in his character’s best interests. “Do we really want to see that?” he quickly added, shaking his head.
“It’s less about his appearance, and more about who he is without Claire,” Heughan said. He’s read the first season-three script (penned by showrunner Ron D. Moore), and he’s also boning up on his Outlander series reading, spending time with both Voyager and John Grey spinoff books, such as The Scottish Prisoner.
“It’s going to be a completely different show,” Heughan said. “Next year’s stuff is probably the most interesting, in a way. We’ve been setting it up, setting the stage, introducing these characters, and now it goes into new, different worlds.” For one, the Caribbean, which will be a major locale change for the story as the characters set sail, although it’s yet to be determined where the production will actually shoot those scenes. Hawaii? Jamaica? Heughan votes for the latter: “Going to Jamaica would be nice! Piña coladas!” – Source
Sam attended the Star Trek Beyond New York Premiere today. He said on twitter that he was a fan of the franchise growing up. Big thanks to my friend Carol, AliKat, and FFA for some of these! I’ve also added new additions to Sam’s appearance at the Piaget Polo S Launch Event earlier in the week. Enjoy!
This story contains spoilers for the “Outlander” season 2 finale and vague plot details from the third book in Diana Gabaldon’s series of novels, “Voyager,” on which season 3 will be based. If you want to go into season 3 with no knowledge of what might come, turn back now.
Season 2 of “Outlander” began with a disoriented Claire Fraser (Caitriona Balfe) returning through the standing stones at Craigh na Dun, alone and pregnant, to reluctantly reunite with her first husband, Frank (Tobias Menzies) in 1948. In the premiere, we saw Claire and Frank negotiating how they might raise a child together, with their relationship irrevocably strained by the events of Claire’s absence and the man she fell in love with during that time away.
Sunday’s finale, titled “Dragonfly in Amber,” showed us the harrowing moments leading up to that reunion, as Claire’s second husband, Jamie (Sam Heughan) convinced her to return to her own time in order to protect her and their unborn child, since he believed that he was destined to die with his men at the Battle of Culloden.
That seemed like the end of Claire and Jamie’s story (although fans of Diana Gabaldon’s novels already knew that there’s plenty more of this tale to be told, with eight books currently published and more to come — not to mention the fact that the show was already renewed for season 3 and season 4), until Claire discovered that Jamie survived both Culloden and the execution of Jacobite soldiers that followed the battle, meaning that there was a chance they could still reunite if she went back through the stones — albeit after 20 years apart.
Given the number of books in Gabaldon’s series (and the fact that viewers would probably riot if Sam Heughan suddenly disappeared from the show), it’s not much of a spoiler to say that Claire and Jamie will someday find each other again. “There’s a lot of challenges to season 3 — there’s a period of time where Jamie and Claire are apart; he thinks that he’s lost her, or at least that she’s alive and well but in the future, so what is he living for? What sort of man is he now?” Heughan observes. “She will eventually return, but they’re both older, so what is Jamie, who is the man he’s become” in the time since they last saw each other?
Those questions — “who is Jamie without Claire, why is he still surviving, what has he got to live for when he’s lost the woman that he loves” — will be central to the character in season 3, according to Heughan.
And therein lies both the tragedy and romance at the heart of the “Outlander” series, which, despite its genre-bending sensibilities, incisively explores the sometimes harsh realities of a lasting relationship, with all the triumphs, complications, joys and heartbreaks that go along with it. When they find their way back together after decades spent separated, Claire and Jamie will have to relearn what it means to be a couple, something that Balfe admits she’s eagerly anticipating in season 3.
“I think what’s going to be most exciting is the reunion between Claire and Jamie and them discovering each other again and falling in love all over again,” she tells Variety. “I think both of them have probably held each other up on a pedestal for 20 years, so in many ways, they’re going to have to destroy that image first before they can fall in love with the person right in front of them, and that’s going to be really interesting. I love the complexity of that, because you can’t be in love with a ghost, and Claire is in many ways in love with Jamie’s ghost, as Jamie is in love with her ghost, and that’s not the people they are when they see each other again.”
The season 2 finale may have jumped ahead in time to introduce us to Claire and Jamie’s daughter, Brianna, on the cusp of adulthood, but we still have 20 years of lost time to revisit, and the show isn’t likely to skip over all of it, especially since those life experiences will inevitably have shaped who Claire and Jamie are now that they’re middle-aged.
“What I’m so excited about as well next season is we’ll see, hopefully, some of her progression as a mother,” Balfe says. “So even though we’ve jumped forward in episode 13 [to see Claire] at 50, hopefully we’ll see some of that journey between late 20s and 50.”
While the actors had yet to read scripts for season 3 when they spoke to Variety before the finale aired, Gabaldon’s “Voyager” gives us some hints as to what we might see in the new season, including a final showdown between Jamie and Menzies’ Black Jack Randall, who was destined to die on Culloden Moor.
“If you’ve read the books you will know that Randall will appear again,” Heughan teases. “I know that Diana has written the scene of how they ended up [back together], so hopefully – and who knows, I haven’t read the script yet, but hopefully, we’ll get to see Jamie and Randall in the Battle of Culloden.”
We’re also likely to see Frank again, to give viewers a sense of the realities of his relationship with Claire. We know from some of Brianna’s comments in the finale that her parents’ marriage wasn’t particularly idyllic in its later years, and Menzies confirms that the tentative plan is for season 3 to explore the couple’s dynamic following the move to Boston, including “the disintegration of their marriage out there… it’s slightly ‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf’ in Boston, which hopefully will be really exciting stuff to dig into.”
Balfe agrees, “The relationship between Claire and Frank is so rich and complex, I’m really looking forward to that.”
After the political intrigue of this season, Heughan says season 3 “feels like a very new chapter,” with trips to tropical climates that are far removed from the chill of Scotland. “There’s a lot of travel involved, and I think that’s the joy of the show — it’s never the same thing, it’s constantly moving, so next season should be quite an adventure.”